Get out of the Silo: Enhance Collaboration and Leverage BIM
What happens when you put five of the most active and in the know Revit users in the Seattle area together in one room? An engaging experience where leaders from multiple disciplines explore how each other’s Revit processes affects the other.
At the March SeaRUG (Seattle Revit User Group) meeting, a cross pollination of experts were brought together from architecture, structural, BIM coordination, construction and an owner, to discuss the use of Revit throughout all disciplines.
Here are the various perspectives to keep in mind when using Revit on your next project:
ARCHITECT: How often is production staff removed from the actual discussion and vice versa? The project manager may not have his hands in the model or understand the tool to a point where his decisions are realistic.
CONTRACTOR: Consider level of design (LOD), at what point has the Architect provided adequate detail to establish relationships? When should the contractor or subcontractors take over and provide accurate up to date and product specific model information to finalize the built condition? Or should it be the contractor’s responsibility?
OWNER: Is the end user, or owner, utilizing Revit models? For the most part, the industry consensus is yes, but mostly for its quantitating abilities. The owner likely does not have the resources (or maybe it’s a small owner) to have a dedicated BIM technician.
SUBCONTRACTOR: Are we working efficiently with the tool? Is it saving us money? Are the models being faked, are they a true representation of the product?
BIM: How can BIM better utilized? Where does it fall short? How can we ensure expectations are followed through? It is directly copied from BRPH blog of Revit.
For more information then contact us here.